A new adaptation of the classic novel The Darling Buds of May by H.E. Bates following the warm hearted, wheeler dealing adventures of the iconic Larkin family in the idyllic Kent countryside.
Watchseries; I so wanted to enjoy it as I am a big fan of Bradley Walsh but no effort was made to freshen the storyline or even the plot. The script was weak and acting felt like they were going through the motions. The mains leads were look-a-likes and didn't need to be. There is a difference between paying
homage and being mimics. It had a Disney family movie feel about it. Will trying again next week to see if it grows on me but I am sceptical.
Mark Price11 October 2021
I so wanted to enjoy it as I am a big fan of Bradley Walsh but no effort was made to freshen the storyline or even the plot. The script was weak and acting felt like they were going through the motions. The mains leads were look-a-likes and didn't need to be. There is a difference between paying
homage and being mimics. It had a Disney family movie feel about it. Will trying again next week to see if it grows on me but I am sceptical.
ianbrumpton11 October 2021
The Larkins watchseries. I'm biased in that I really liked the original and rewatched it two or three years ago and fell in love with it all over again. Viewers who watched that classic version aren't going to warm to the remake as it doesn't add anything to it aside from some modern sensibilities in terms of tone and casting diversity.
For those that didn't see the 90's The Darling Buds of May this is a half-decent family comedy in the same vein as the Durells which the writer Simon Nye also adapted and the Indian Doctor with Sanjeev Bhaskar, but probably not as successful as either of those shows.
I like Bradley Walsh and thought he was great in Dr. Who, but he doesn't have the comic talents of David Jason who made the original so enjoyable. This is more of an ensemble piece and sadly falls a bit flat, the humour is lacking and so is the cheeky spark between Ma and Pa Larkin. 5/10.
jjparish16 October 2021
Should never have been made. Its just a parody of the great work of HE Bates. Set in a 1950's small english village but reimagined by 2021 tv executives to look and feel nothing like a 1950's english village. The casting director should be out of work. Its not diversity its just rediculous tokenism.
phil-8373711 October 2021
I didn't watch the original which was the Darling Buds of May. I gave this a go because I like Bradley Walsh. His wife in the show was also very good in No Offence.
Oh dear how I wish I'd not wasted my time. My wife and I switched this off after less than 30 mins, simply awful.
Foxtrot-Alpha77710 October 2021
I was never a fan of the original adaptation so it was always going to be a hard sell but with Bradley Walsh doing a very poor impersonation or David Jason's version of spa Larkin tipped me over the edge.
It's never a good idea to try and do another version of a much loved (not by me) series and this demonstrates why.
stuartpbottomley10 October 2021
This lacks the charm and warmth of the 90s version with David Jason. Half the cast of this seem to doing a poor impression of the previous incarnation equivalent characters. The other half don't fit the part they are playing. When I heard this was happening I was really hoping it would be almost as good if not better than the Darling Buds of May.
User Reviews
Watchseries; I so wanted to enjoy it as I am a big fan of Bradley Walsh but no effort was made to freshen the storyline or even the plot. The script was weak and acting felt like they were going through the motions. The mains leads were look-a-likes and didn't need to be. There is a difference between paying homage and being mimics. It had a Disney family movie feel about it. Will trying again next week to see if it grows on me but I am sceptical.
I so wanted to enjoy it as I am a big fan of Bradley Walsh but no effort was made to freshen the storyline or even the plot. The script was weak and acting felt like they were going through the motions. The mains leads were look-a-likes and didn't need to be. There is a difference between paying homage and being mimics. It had a Disney family movie feel about it. Will trying again next week to see if it grows on me but I am sceptical.
The Larkins watchseries. I'm biased in that I really liked the original and rewatched it two or three years ago and fell in love with it all over again. Viewers who watched that classic version aren't going to warm to the remake as it doesn't add anything to it aside from some modern sensibilities in terms of tone and casting diversity.
For those that didn't see the 90's The Darling Buds of May this is a half-decent family comedy in the same vein as the Durells which the writer Simon Nye also adapted and the Indian Doctor with Sanjeev Bhaskar, but probably not as successful as either of those shows.
I like Bradley Walsh and thought he was great in Dr. Who, but he doesn't have the comic talents of David Jason who made the original so enjoyable. This is more of an ensemble piece and sadly falls a bit flat, the humour is lacking and so is the cheeky spark between Ma and Pa Larkin. 5/10.
Should never have been made. Its just a parody of the great work of HE Bates. Set in a 1950's small english village but reimagined by 2021 tv executives to look and feel nothing like a 1950's english village. The casting director should be out of work. Its not diversity its just rediculous tokenism.
I didn't watch the original which was the Darling Buds of May. I gave this a go because I like Bradley Walsh. His wife in the show was also very good in No Offence.
Oh dear how I wish I'd not wasted my time. My wife and I switched this off after less than 30 mins, simply awful.
I was never a fan of the original adaptation so it was always going to be a hard sell but with Bradley Walsh doing a very poor impersonation or David Jason's version of spa Larkin tipped me over the edge.
It's never a good idea to try and do another version of a much loved (not by me) series and this demonstrates why.
This lacks the charm and warmth of the 90s version with David Jason. Half the cast of this seem to doing a poor impression of the previous incarnation equivalent characters. The other half don't fit the part they are playing. When I heard this was happening I was really hoping it would be almost as good if not better than the Darling Buds of May.