Ruling with an iron fist requires an aspiring dictator to know the playbook for absolute power, as history's despots prove in this sardonic docuseries.
Watchseries; If you like documentaries, don't watch this. The animated drawings are childish. Why did they not use actual footage? Much more interesting.
If you are intrigued by war and dictators, Ken Burns the War is a much better watch.
xaaf_de_raaf12 July 2021
If you like documentaries, don't watch this. The animated drawings are childish. Why did they not use actual footage? Much more interesting.
If you are intrigued by war and dictators, Ken Burns the War is a much better watch.
EddieGunner10 July 2021
How to Become a Tyrant watchseries. Yeah they were dictators, but they didn't show how US imperialism supported some of those and finance them while they needed them, after they throw them to wild masses, anyway some interesting facts can be seen in it.
horst6911 July 2021
But in the end it's too much of entertainment over substance .
It's a highly complex topic that deserves better than a few neatly put together soundbites and anecdotes, which ultimately is what this TV show presents .
And certainly 6 short episode can't even cover the limited scope of the matter the makers chose to include .
Nice try, Netflix, but you are what you are .
jevans-2070512 July 2021
No China are you kidding me? What are you trying to say Netflix??
zzzzzztao17 July 2021
Zidong mao isWhere is the evil mao? Forgotten. He was mortified. I feel disappointed.
Faristuta11 July 2021
"How to Become a Dictator" tries to oversimplify history but does a bad job at it. For example, analysing Saddam, they ignore that one reason he was popular (and remains popular with many Iraqis) is the prosperity Iraq had under him in healthcare, education, women's freedom, religious freedom for Christians and near-complete absence of street crime. They hated him for his brutality against his rivals and the war against Iran. He was preceded by very brutal dictators and succeeded by a military man from an occupying force, yet they don't include these in this documentary. If you don't present him in this fashion then you're being dishonest.
Many Russians miss the communist days of the Soviet Union. Many obviously are horrified by it. History and world leaders are very complicated and you can't just present them as "good guy" or "bad guy" like it's a Disney movie.
Last point, many of these brutal dictators and others not mentioned in this documentary stay in power because of excellent relationships they have with powerful western countries (USA, France as an example), and they lose their grip when that support stops for whatever reason.
User Reviews
Watchseries; If you like documentaries, don't watch this. The animated drawings are childish. Why did they not use actual footage? Much more interesting.
If you are intrigued by war and dictators, Ken Burns the War is a much better watch.
If you like documentaries, don't watch this. The animated drawings are childish. Why did they not use actual footage? Much more interesting.
If you are intrigued by war and dictators, Ken Burns the War is a much better watch.
How to Become a Tyrant watchseries. Yeah they were dictators, but they didn't show how US imperialism supported some of those and finance them while they needed them, after they throw them to wild masses, anyway some interesting facts can be seen in it.
But in the end it's too much of entertainment over substance .
It's a highly complex topic that deserves better than a few neatly put together soundbites and anecdotes, which ultimately is what this TV show presents .
And certainly 6 short episode can't even cover the limited scope of the matter the makers chose to include .
Nice try, Netflix, but you are what you are .
No China are you kidding me? What are you trying to say Netflix??
Zidong mao isWhere is the evil mao? Forgotten. He was mortified. I feel disappointed.
"How to Become a Dictator" tries to oversimplify history but does a bad job at it. For example, analysing Saddam, they ignore that one reason he was popular (and remains popular with many Iraqis) is the prosperity Iraq had under him in healthcare, education, women's freedom, religious freedom for Christians and near-complete absence of street crime. They hated him for his brutality against his rivals and the war against Iran. He was preceded by very brutal dictators and succeeded by a military man from an occupying force, yet they don't include these in this documentary. If you don't present him in this fashion then you're being dishonest.
Many Russians miss the communist days of the Soviet Union. Many obviously are horrified by it. History and world leaders are very complicated and you can't just present them as "good guy" or "bad guy" like it's a Disney movie.
Last point, many of these brutal dictators and others not mentioned in this documentary stay in power because of excellent relationships they have with powerful western countries (USA, France as an example), and they lose their grip when that support stops for whatever reason.